Google is not the only player integrating AI into search. Competing offerings like Perplexity AI and OpenAI’s ChatGPT (among others) also provide AI-driven search or Q&A experiences. However, each takes a different approach.
Google AI Mode vs. Perplexity AI
Perplexity AI is a newer AI-powered search engine that, like Google’s AI Mode, answers questions by fetching information from the web and then summarising it with an AI model. Perplexity has gained a niche following for its clean interface and strong focus on citations. How does it differ from Google’s AI Mode?
- Independence and integration: Perplexity is an independent platform, not a general-purpose search engine with its own vast index like Google. It relies on querying the web and then uses an AI (such as GPT-3.5 or GPT-4) to formulate an answer. The key difference is integration with data systems: Google’s AI Mode benefits from Google’s internal data (knowledge graph, etc.) and infrastructure, potentially giving it a broader and deeper pool of information to draw from. Perplexity, being separate, doesn’t have a proprietary index on the scale of Google’s, so it’s limited to what it can fetch via search and any indexed sources it has.
- Real-time information: Perplexity does fetch information in real time (that’s one of its selling points – it’s not limited by a training cutoff). In practice, Google AI Mode and Perplexity both can provide up-to-date info, but Google’s integration means it can also pull from live updates (news, etc.) seamlessly. Perplexity will show you what sources it found and often includes the time or date of those sources. Google will similarly include fresh sources and even say when it’s using real-time info. Both are strong in freshness, but Google might have an edge for truly live data (e.g. Google can directly incorporate something from minutes ago if it’s indexed or in its news feed).
- User base and access: Perplexity is available to anyone for free (with some limits) and has a premium version for more advanced GPT-4 answers. Google’s AI Mode, at least in early 2025, is restricted to invited users or Google One subscribers with AI features. Over time, Google will likely roll it out more broadly.
Strengths & weaknesses: Google AI Mode’s strength against Perplexity is the combination of breadth and depth – it can answer more complex questions by drawing on more sources and using better reasoning, all integrated in one place. Perplexity’s strength is being lean and focused: it often gives very concise answers with minimal fluff and clearly shows sources, which some users (especially researchers) appreciate. However, users have to go to a separate site or app to use Perplexity, whereas Google’s AI Mode is in a place where billions of searches are already happening. Overall, Perplexity pioneered the kind of experience that Google is now building natively, but Google’s version could eclipse it by virtue of superior data integration and user convenience.
Google AI Mode vs. ChatGPT
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, isn’t a search engine, but it is a prominent AI tool often compared in this space because it answers questions in a conversational way. It’s important to clarify the context: ChatGPT (the default free version) does not have direct access to live web information. Still, many people use ChatGPT as an information tool, so how does Google’s AI Mode differ?
- Data sources: Google AI Mode pulls from the live web and Google’s index every time you ask a question. ChatGPT’s default knowledge, on the other hand, comes from its training data (which, as of March 2025, includes data up to around October 2023, with limited knowledge of more recent events unless using an update or browsing). This means out-of-the-box ChatGPT can’t reliably handle queries about very recent events or dynamic information (unless you’re using the paid version of course).
- Purpose and usage: ChatGPT is a general AI assistant – you can ask it to write code, draft emails, brainstorm ideas, educate you on a subject, etc., all in a conversational flow. Google’s AI Mode is narrower in purpose: it’s meant to enhance search. So while it can also handle coding questions or explanations, it doesn’t for example directly write a long essay unless that’s part of answering your query. ChatGPT often excels at creative tasks or open-ended discussions that go beyond factual Q&A. If you asked ChatGPT to write a short story or solve a puzzle, it would do so from its trained knowledge. Google’s AI Mode might not even engage with a prompt that isn’t essentially a search query. Thus, ChatGPT’s strength is its versatility and depth in pure conversation (with no requirement of citing sources), whereas Google’s AI Mode focuses on being an accurate research tool embedded in search results.
- Citation and trustworthiness: By design, ChatGPT does not provide citations for its answers, and it can sometimes “hallucinate” facts or sources, which is problematic if you need to verify information. Google’s AI Mode always ties back to sources and will avoid answering if it can’t ensure accuracy. For someone looking for an answer they can trust or use in research, AI Mode’s approach is more transparent. ChatGPT is great for quick explanations or drafting, but if a user needs to double-check facts, they have to manually ask for sources or use the browsing tool. In contrast, Google AI Mode includes the links up front, making it easier to trust (or at least verify) the response.
- Model capabilities: ChatGPT (especially GPT-4 version) is extremely powerful in reasoning and language, and in some contexts it might produce a more detailed or eloquent answer than Google’s AI Mode. However, ChatGPT’s weakness is it might not know the latest specifics or data points post its training cutoff. Google’s model in AI Mode is also highly capable and is specifically tuned for providing “high-quality responses” in search.
- Accessibility: ChatGPT is accessed via OpenAI’s website (or API) and requires an account sign-up, with the GPT-4 version paywalled under ChatGPT Plus. Google’s AI Mode, once fully launched, will be accessible to anyone on Google Search for free. That is a huge difference in potential reach. ChatGPT’s interface (the free version) is purely a chat with no extra web content, while Google’s AI Mode lives alongside the web content it’s drawing from.
Strengths & weaknesses: Google’s AI Mode is strongest where ChatGPT is weak: real-time factual queries with need for source attribution. It provides an answer you can cite or trust to be up to date. ChatGPT’s strength is in open-domain creativity and instructive dialogue – it’s often more flexible in what you can ask. For an SEO expert or researcher, Google AI Mode might be the preferred tool for gathering information with confidence in the source; ChatGPT might be what you use to brainstorm how to use that information or to generate content from it. One could imagine using both: e.g., ask Google AI Mode for the latest stats or details on a topic (with sources), then use ChatGPT to help craft a report or article around that info. Another point: ChatGPT, being model-based, sometimes injects more of a conversational filler and can occasionally deviate. Google AI Mode, guided by actual search results, is more likely to stick to the point. In summary, ChatGPT is a broad AI assistant with knowledge (albeit time-limited), whereas Google’s AI Mode is an AI-enhanced search specialist grounded in live data. Each has their place, but for the specific job of answering search queries with current info, AI Mode is built to excel.